Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (3963)	12/7/1998 10:53:00 PM
From: Spots	Read Replies (1) of 14778

>>Now zip +1 The license agreement made no mention of business use, and it was clearer than most. I think it's both unreasonable and unrealistic, personally. But I don't think I have any authority over it because I don't like it. I could make current-event analogies which would be unwelcome here (at least to me if anyone else made them <g>), so I won't. PLEASE do not interpret this to mean I am perfect in this regard. I commit at least my share of transgressions (and probably some extras transgressions just in case others have skipped some <gg>). I'm just struggling to kick open a loophole before I succumb ... >>Don't you think the intent of the restrictions are for business use? A multiple use license makes sense to me in such a case. No to the first, yes perfect sense to the second. But I'm not PowerQuest, so I don't get to make that decision. Sadly. >>Do you think PowerQuest is trying to limit an individual from using the program for his/her own use on two machines? Yes. I think Power Quest wants you to buy two copies for two machines, unless you "disassemble" the first before using it on the second. That's what the license says. I see no distinction for individuals (somebody tell me I'm misreading). I also find expensive, multi-machine licenses on their web site. (I haven't checked that in the past two or three months, though.) I guess this is the source of my frustration: Normally I've been able to weasel in one way or another (depends on what "is" is <g>). Say by use on one machine at a time, or on one business and one home machine, or similar escape clauses in the license. Here it puts it up to me, and I have difficulty facing the fact that I'm willing to violate it when it's stated so clearly. So I haven't. So far, anyhow. Spots

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next