Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (17731)	12/8/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

brees, my original response on the dreaded "unit" topic, taken a bit out of its combative context: I have not served in the military, though I respect both the institution and those who have served. Perhaps everybody here could state whether they've served or not, and whether they think that having served in the military should be a prerequisite for stating one's political views. My understanding is a lot of popular Republicans would have to shut up too, if that prerequisite held. Vaughn responded directly to the message that came out of, so I assume at least he read it. Didn't deter him from moving on, of course. Ish, I also responded to directly at some point. For everybody else who considers the unit question meaningful, I will repeat some old questions: Do you think only those who have served in the military should be allowed to vote, or discuss politics? Do you think only those in Congress who have served in the military should get to vote on military matters? Many countries are run by the military, we usually don't like to put ourselves in that class.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next