Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 137.34

+0.8%

Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (19350)	12/8/1998 6:09:00 PM
From: JMD	Read Replies (1) of 152472

My, and haven't we just been the liveliest little thread today? An historical note: Before I went off to M.I.T. to do my Orthogonal Wave Formation--Theory and Practice thesis, I was a history dude. Seems to me we are at "call and raise" in the game and I would be mighty disappointed if the Q blinked. Compromise and diplomacy are terrific if the guys on the other side want to play that way--otherwise "my way or the highway" seems the more appropriate mode and with Ericy the choice seems beyond obvious. Nobody on this board invested in the Mighty Q as an alternative to T-Bills. This is showtime and with all due apologies to Tim I say let's find out who has the Titanium Gazinkas. The rumors of suppliers reporting weak sales has just got to be a crock--cell phones are flying out the door in my neck of the woods. Can't believe it's different anyplace else. Q in the 40's? Well haul out the credit cards boys [unless you're more comfy with e-Bay]. Regards, Surfer Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next