SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E4L, Inc. (NYSE: ETV)
ETV 13.93-0.4%Nov 19 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mike devage who wrote (793)12/9/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: A. Geiche  Read Replies (2) of 1080
 
I never short and never promote any stocks; and I do not post often: I am too busy for that. And if I attack, I attack only unscrupulous shorts (like Mr. Pink) or possessed, silly stock promoters. The "problem dealing with people" is sheer nonsense as your entire post: I am not a petty businessman.. and I am a landlord in addition. I am dealing a lot with people and quite successfully. As for the nm web site, there isn't even any indication there (or I am blind?) that it is nm web site. This perplexes a great many investors and, therefore, gravely harm nm stock. To tell them, "why you do not listen to CEO, etc." is stupid, for it doesn't matter what he said: the fact remains that the whole issue is a sordid mess and an abracadabra. And the result is while a shorts squeeze remains to be nothing but just a dream, the longs margin squeeze WAS (already) a fact - a devastating fact. The issue here is not just some stupid drivel (90% of all these chatting boards) but disastrous losses to which the investors were subjected by an idiotic blunder (is it just a blunder???) of the company management, and the management bears responsibility for this.I wouldn't care, but unfortunately I hold a very substantial position in nm. I am absolutely certain that it is far, far bigger than yours; and it was even many times bigger before.

How serious the problem is I concluded from the reaction of ALL my
friends (not just some petty investors). None of them even consider this stock.I posted about this before (wasn't that a "substance to debates"? It was and is obvious to me that the attitude of many, if not most, big investors to this stock is just the same as the attitude of my friends, that this problem, therefore, is devastatingly serious and is responsible for the poor performance of the stock.

As I said, I post very rarely. I post ONLY if I have a substantial position in the stock, and I post ONLY if there is any problem with it -- to drive investors attention to that problem.

Now continue your exalted drivel. This is my last post here and I hope
it is just the last post.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext