SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 165.07-1.0%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gregg Powers who wrote (19485)12/10/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Gregg - I am curious about what it is that you disagree with:

My point was that the ITU has stated that they will not approve any standard for which there are IPR issues. The ITU has a much lesser standard of proof than do the courts thus Ericsson can disrupt CDMA-2000 at ITU just as much as Qualcomm can disrupt Ericsson. This is further backed up by the ITU's recent press release which says it looks like there may be no CDMA 3g ITU standard.

However, when it comes to actual deployment, the IPR burden of proof is much higher. Thus Ericsson is going to have a much more difficult time stopping CDMAOne's next generation (including CDMA2000) than Qualcomm will have stopping Ericsson's CDMA deployments.

I really don't know of anything controversial in this (except perhaps to Tero), so I am very curious what you disagree with.

Clark

PS Gregg - You take the Ericsson compromise as a sign that their patent position isn't strong - i.e. you take it as if it really were a compromise that was forced on them by the strength of their legal position. I respectfully disagree. I think that this is a position that was forced on them by technical issues - 4.x just won't work.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext