SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Larry Brew who wrote (25444)12/10/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) of 31646
 
Larry --- Nothing is missing--- but possibly direction has been found. This has nothing to do with software or technology. It has to do with basic business,,, not even 101--- high school. No one has ever said anything about the company or changes needed. Mention of things preferred but no heavy criticism. Shareholder equity, PR, just plain treating shareholders nicely all are taught in high school. Possibly they have forgotten where the money comes from or that shareholders expect to make a little as they make a ton.

Granted this is not a majority of shares but it should send Jj and the directors a message as this was started on a whim just hours ago. Just think what a week and some serious effort could do. What if the WSJ caught this and ran a story? What would a decent reporter have to write about with a tiny bit of research on the reasons shareholders are unhappy? We are not talking one disgrunteled holder or a few that bought high, or a sector or mkt collapse----- the statement is "you guys should be doing a hell of a lot more or different! If we are upset we will leave and who in the hell will come in?" This is not a revolt and no one is jumping up and down yelling--- it is a sane message that was needed at the last SH meeting!

I only hope they see what is going on here and get their head into the sunshine or a good company will suffer even more. It is time to take care of the small SHs instead of taking care of the large (and special) SHs and themselves.

The institutional holdings suck percentage wise. Excitement came from a lousey 175K purchased by a fund that could do a mil--- but will not for the same reasons we are writing today...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News