Dell Technologies Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.

DELL 138.94

0.0%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stock bull who wrote (84864)	12/11/1998 11:04:00 AM
From: BGR	Read Replies (1) of 176387

Stock Bull, The article that you posted mentions what many others believe but not the rationale behind their beliefs. I would not classify it as a joke, but most definitely inconsequential as it presents no new information. Surely it is quite well known - and have been for some time - that some expect DELL to falter and CPQ to shine. Expectations are based on analysis and are worthless otherwise, and the only piece of analysis that the article provides is that of Kumar regarding DELL's desktop segments growth. That has been discussed to death on this thread during DELL's earnings and you may look up the posts by CTC regarding that (non and possibly misinterpreted)-issue. However, even more ludicrous is the claim that it is a baby step for CPQ and a giant one for DELL. It may look like a baby step for CPQ because of favorable earnings comparisons (it's earnings last year were not very robust thus making comparisons easier) but what about the next 5 year business plan? I have read numerous articles in the popular media stating w/o any analysis that all indirects are going to go direct and eat DELL's lunch, whereas the HBR article clearly explained the intricacies of that model and how hard it is for a company to switch it's model. This is another issue which has been discussed to death in this thread. Even rudedog (who has been unusually fair in his analysis despite a slight CPQ bias IMO :-))would not claim that it is going to be easy and he has better business knowledge that several of these so-called analysts and money runners. And, no new information was presented by this article in this regard too. What that article completely misses is the attempted transition (and the risks involved therein) by CPQ from a box-maker to an integrated hardware, systems software and services provider more in the lines to IBM. Personally I feel that to be the most interesting piece of the puzzle for the CPQ investor (I am not one). And finally, money flow means very little in the long term. -Apratim.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next