Ask Mohan about the Market Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: IceShark who wrote (17341)	12/12/1998 5:24:00 AM
From: Tony van Werkhooven	Read Replies (1) of 18056

The prior post had the following comments: <<And (it has to be speculation only) it would seem almost certain that other adulterers - FDR, Ike, LBJ, and JFK>> <<It is by no means certain that FDR or Ike were adulterers. To drag these towering icons into the fecal pond that SickWilly slithers in puts you four square in his hall of shame supporters.>> I think the real issue is that FDR, Ike, LBJ, and JFK, if in fact they were adulterers, did not lie about such activity under oath. Clinton did.The issue is NOT adultery, the issue is perjury, obstruction of justice, etc. Perjury by Clinton is unacceptable behavior and should not be condoned because of the personal nature of the activity that he was trying to hide. I voted for him twice. I am still amazed that he is still trying to blame the messenger rather than the guy he sees in the mirror in the morning. It is unfortunate for the country that this has become a partisan rather than a moral/legal/constitutional issue. Tony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next