SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GerryMiles who wrote (4800)12/12/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: andrew peterson  Read Replies (1) of 11417
 
Hi, Gerry -- I'm going to try hard to keep this constructive, since
as always, I hope your information is right. What you're talking about with HP and WAVX sounds a lot like that "fork in the road" that people were discussing on RB awhile back. But I know I'm not alone when I have a hard time knowing when you're having "fun and games" with us and when it's "Serious in some." (https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=6525031)

One thing I just can't figure out is why you continue to make such specific and very insistent predictions when you yourself acknowledge that you can't control the timing (https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=6803770). Is this just fun and games? If so, a lot of people are getting their knickers in a twist over nothing. If you're serious, why make specific predictions about something which you yourself acknowledge that you can't control? If you have information about a buy-in by HP, why not just say something like "I've got information that HP is going to be buying in." Quick, easy and you don't have to eat your words when Friday comes and goes.

By the way, we still don't have a clue about AOL or about GI -- for most all of us, that's still pure speculation.

Speaking of timing, help me understand something else. I can't help but notice that each of your inital posts on recent developments (if they prove in fact to be that) followed within a few minutes of someone having posted identical information over on RB.

RB: 12/10/98 3:56 ragingbull.com

SI: 12/10/98 4:40 -- Message 6779262

RB: 12/11/98 2:40 --
ragingbull.com

SI: 12/11/98 3:00 -- Message 6795259

What's that about? Again, I'm not trying to be confrontational here, I just want to understand how to take what you say.

Take care,

Andrew
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext