All right. It's reasonable enough to think that news would be leaking out in several different directions at the same time. But I'd sure expect to see that leak reflected by a substantial increase in volume. Any thoughts about why with all these developments supposedly leaking out it's not showing up in the stock's volume and price? Every other time good news has been coming, we've seen the stock move in the days before the release.
By the way, I'll be very happy to to eat my words about AOL, such as they are. In fact the only words I've spoken on the subject is that all I've seen is speculation -- and that ain't much to eat. I'm certainly not saying it isn't true, just that as far as I can tell, everything that's been said on the subject so far has been unsubstantiated. If you can be more concrete about it, I'm all ears!
I have no problem with post 4800 -- I might have put up the wrong link accidentally. I meant to link to your "fun and games" post as well to the post in which you speak of not being able to control the timing of releases.
Again, believe me that I don't want you to be wrong. I just want us to have some clue about how to read what you post here. As I'm sure you'll understand, we have reason to be confused by what you say. I'm not sure whether that's intentional or accidental. If it's accidental, I'm sure that we can make things clearer. If it's intentional, well, that would be nice to know. |
