SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KM who wrote (5089)12/12/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: Thomas L Nielsen  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
<<Then, the remaining creditors, such as trade creditors, stock and bondholders, leaseholders, etc. are placed in various classes and paid to the extent that assets remain, under a plan of reorganization and/or liquidation, whichever the case may be. Post-petition fees of the bankruptcy professionals; i.e., debtor's attorneys, creditors' committee attorneys, accountants, appraisers, etc. are also paid from the estate.>>

Since the stock holders are essentially the owners that have gone bankrupt with the debt it seems logical that they most likely would get the tail end of such a payoff. Since the bottom line for Syquest might be less than zero, then the stock holder would get part of the zero but wouldn't be responsible for the debt.

IMO only
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext