SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 173.02-0.9%10:26 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Raymond who wrote (19635)12/13/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: Greg B.  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Raymond,

Could not GSM-CDMA also serve to function on a GSM core network, but also give you the performance characteristics of the original W-CDMA proposal?

A while back you wrote:

Has anyone arguing against that IS-95 is the only 2G standard using CDMA. That CDMA-2000 is a clear upgrade path from IS-95. I haven't seen anyone arguing against that the airinterface of CDMA-2000 is more compatible to IS-95 then WCDMA is to GSM airinterface. They are not compatible at all. This is the whole point what the WCDMA camp is trying to get across.They don't want to have any backward ompability. Everytime you have to think about backward compability you will not get the most optimal system. If you want to have backward compablity you can upgrade the GSM network with EDGE which will give high speeds but will not give all the advantages that a complete new system can give you.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext