SHOPPING.COM had an interesting beginning. In fact , if chief executive John Markley had not come aboard, your dreams would have been answered. SHOPPING.COM would probably not be around. The previous heads of SHOPPING.COM ( Bill Gross) had no business running this company. They figured if they made a product, it would sell. Obviously, that strategy does not work with such a small company. SHOPPING.COM, under chief executive John Markley , changed the waySHOPPING.COM does business. They now produce what the
market is asking for, and they are selling up to $ 300,000 a day
I know people are skeptical that the big boys will squash SHOPPING.COM My question is why, when SHOPPING.COM has one of the only web site with more then 2 Mill SKU This is a niche market too small for the big boys to justify. Sounds to me like a great acquisition target, not bankruptcy.
chief executive John Markley is building the company in building block type fashion. The way a company should be built, not on hype, but real contracts, and real earnings. The past losses only reflect chief executive John Markley putting an end to the previous disasters of his predecessors.
Going forward, do you think SHOPPING.COM can put any money to the bottom line? Would vendors grant SHOPPING.COM an exclusive to worldwide production of their product if they had any question of SHOPPING.COM financial future? These are products the market has been asking for, therefore should sell through, RIGHT?
Do yourself a favor: Ask what the Internet market is today? I'll help you, its north of $10 billion. Ask your local broker how well online sells?
Oh, by the way, when you have sold me those cheap shares, how do you intend to cover? You better scam some other unsuspecting investors and scare their shares away.
|
