SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 220.28-6.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zsteve who wrote (27120)12/13/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: Fortinwit  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
zsteve,
Thanks for posting the Kurlak piece. I know he engenders rather heated debate depending on one's semi bullishness. But he hit on something worth revisiting. All the evidence that I've seen so far is that the Fortune 500 are simply not going to be buying PCs in size next year, and that Y2K software/consulting solutions are consuming large portions of IT budgets. I concur with TK, look out below in 99 as far as PC sales go.
...Will the Y2K issue increase PC buying dramatically to offset down corporate profits? It is not clear, but we see companies such as Merrill Lynch solving Y2K without much change in PC buying by simply testing existing equipment, which overwhelmingly passes. Practically all leading Pentium, Pentium II and AMD K-6 PCs are Y2K compliant. If more horsepower is not needed then why replace a perfectly good PC in 1999? It appears that software fixes in mainframes to deal with Y2K are taking up a lot of the IT budget. We would not be surprised if corporate PC buys are flat or fall off in 1999....

And, what happens to MU when the Koreans storm the beaches?

F.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext