John: I think you've overstepped your boundary a bit. Please point out where I have stated that "Discover Y2K", the product, is worthless.
I have evaluated it from a developer's perspective on its technical merits.
The supporting marketing/sales ... now, that's a different story. The marketing, in particular the web page, is LESS than worthless. It damages the credibility and quality of the company, thereby casting doubt on the product's ability to perform.
If I thought Discover Y2K were worthless, I would have posted the evaluation that I did so many months ago. Remember that one? The one I decided I wouldn't post because it would hurt the company's efforts? The one where several CSHK supporters were concerned about the possibility of my being biased against it? The one you agreed wasn't biased after you read it? The one where several CSHK supporters maligned my integrity and doubted my technical expertise prior to the evaluation, then apologized after having read it? The one I emailed to several people, and to Rhonda at Cashco? The one she thanked me for? Remember that one?
You mentioned that I haven't evaluated Discover Y2K. Unless they are now distributing a different product than the "Eleventh Hour" software from a few months ago, then I absolutely HAVE evaluated it. Would you like me to post that evaluation? Then others on this thread could see for themselves that I never claimed "Discover Y2K" or its predecessor version to be worthless.
John, if you're trying to get my dander up, you've very nearly succeeded.
All statements in this post are my opinions only.
TED |
