Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: teevee who wrote (10478)	12/14/1998 8:53:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) of 26850

Thanks for the reply.. I find it interesting that they would process reject material now and not have done that with the original sampling. For some reason I was under the impression that it was a new sampling from a different area. So in fact, WSP does not have a sampling in the works from a new area at this time, right? Are we perhaps waiting for some new drill holes from "outside" areas in order to better define the "dyke"? Also, the map they recently published does in fact indicate 3 "sheets" which appear to be heading towards one point. Is this cone theory supported by this fact, or could this be simply explained by fractures over the last millenium that has been "dipped" towards a common point? Don't get me wrong, I'm not questioning the apparent fact that there is source, but I'm trying to figure out from my vantage point where the source could be and at this time we would be very fortunate to have it pointed at by the direction of the currently found "dykes" - regards - denis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next