SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Contra Guy who wrote (1017)12/14/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: David Eddy   of 1361
 
Ben -

Although this may seem intuitive to you, this is simply not true and in fact represents one of the biggest misunderstandings about Y2K. This myth is closely related to another that is also repeated again and again and again: many software development projects are late and cost a lot more than anticipated. That's absolutely true, and I have the scars to prove it. The point is that Y2K does NOT fall into this category.

I'm not sure I follow your reasoning here.

I totally agree that elimination of 'scope creep' is a major advantage on Y2K efforts.

But "just keep it working like it does" isn't that easy...who's to say what is or is not a correct system now? Systems I would work on it was typical for someone to be yelling "Fix it!"...great, so how's it broken? What will it look like when it's fixed? Slippery questions.

Lots of these systems have been running under the covers for so long that no one really knows what it is they do.

If you're given clear marching orders to sit down & simply plow thru the work, that's fine...but I've seen far too much ongoing quibbling over whether or not Y2K is or is not an issue.

I still see a major immovable deadline.

And the solution to immovable deadlines is to toss functionality overboard.

- David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext