Hi,
There is no further need to "hype" Dr. Bob's cone theory-the facts speak for themselves. What I find interesting is that the available data made the cone sheet so obvious, when a number of geologists took a hard look, they independently came to the same conclusion-if something looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, call it a duck. All I did is bring the notion of a cone sheet to the attention of everyone on this thread and GT's thread well before the market caught on(I believe WSP was trading in the $1.28-1.40 range when I realized what was going on, got on board and started posting-in fact my first post, prior to a hard review of all data, was negative). If you want to accuse me of being a "Winspear supporter", I am guilty. I did my best in trying to explain in laymans terms what a cone sheet is, and in the context of the possible impact on Winspear's share price potential. In brief, I bought Winspear on the basis of my 25 years experience in the mineral exploration industry and buying select junior resource stocks over that period of time. This thread makes it abundantly clear that everyone has their own "rational" for buying and selling. I am comfortable with my position in Winspear, are you?
As the share price of Winspear rises, the perceived risks will increase (the wall of worry will be too much for many) however, I will hold my position until after the bulk sample results. I don't trade.
regards and good luck,
teevee |
