Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43454)	12/15/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) of 1572942

Tenchusatsu, <AMD was the one who had the rocky transition to 0.25 um,> I think there is a common confusion here. When the press (and you blindly repetiting it) says "rocky transition", it creates an image that AMD has had difficulties in launching of the new 0.25 technology. This is not true, according to known facts. AMD was almost instantly successful in 0.25 - the current store shelves are the proof. What was difficult was exactly opposite to that transition: difficult for AMD was to STAY in 0.35 and push it to the sweet market spot of 233 MHZ (at that time). This has nothing to do with "transition", and the implication you want to make about "transition to 0.18" has no grounds. <I'll let Paul reply to this statement.> Sure, what is the panorama out his garage door? Hopefully something better than "Huh?" - Ali

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next