Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (19939)	12/15/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Even the most retarded on this thread know what was meant by the term "misdemeanor" in the Constitution. It was meant to involve crimes other than felonies or "high crimes". But the more perplexing problem is that you display the intellect of a germ. The drafters of the Constitution made the decision that only "high crimes" or felonies were the only thing a President could be impeached for and they left the words misdemeanor in just to confuse us (reference : Law According to Dippy Pinhead). You're a moron of epic proportions. Here we have Dipy the lamebrain convincing us that "misdemeanor" was not defined under present law during the drafting of the Constitution. Guess what doofus...there were NO "books" before the Constitution. The Constitution crated the standard we live by today. Before then we were subject to Colonial law under British rule and I hate to break this to you but they recognized "misdemeanors". IF you even had an inkling of history or law you'd know that the word "misdemeanor" was written into the judicial record from the outset. Even Aaron Burr was tried on a misdemeanor you numbskull! I've read some dim-witted arguments before but yours takes the Blue Ribbon for idiocy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next