Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic

INTC 40.56

+10.3%

Nov 28 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (21892)	12/15/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Read Replies (2) of 27012

Hello Frank. Nice to see the futures up and yes, it was a great day in the market. Now, now. Partisan is in the eye of the beholder. Can you think of 1 partisan in the committee on the other side who was willing to vote against impeachment of Mr. Nixon? I can't remember a single one. It was only bipartisan then because some on the other side voted along with the then Majority. Frank. I am beginning to believe that you have not watched one single day of the hearings (it was broadcasted over and over again on C-Span) or that you even remember how partisan the Nixon impeachment hearings really were. And Mr. Nixon had a lot more people behind him when all that stuff started. You will have to read up on that story back then. Do do you know that Mr. Clinton stated in 1974 that reckless behavior in the President's office was sufficient to impeach? And Hillary was giving advice back then. You really should read all this to make informed statements about partisan ship. gg. Throwing out your Congress Men for voting their conscience is not the way to go. But, on the other hand, you may be right. Voting your conscience IS probably worse then supposedly lying under oath. And then again. Maybe our greed SHOULD come first. And what better way to blame the stock market swings on the Clinton stuff. I wonder what it was last year when I lost money in October? Or did I just think that I lost money? Maybe what was wasn't and what is now, isn't. Oh, whatever. gg. Our language is getting more complicated lately. And what's good for the goose is good for the gander, is no more? Sonny

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next