SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AAPL? How to trade/invest?
AAPL 271.32+0.6%3:59 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: xu, b. who wrote (84)5/1/1996 12:36:00 AM
From: Alex Jung   of 162
 
Xu, b.

Pardon my intrusion to the AAPL traders here, and I claim a notta about the technical analysis, but I am not sure if the bottom has reached yet for AAPL. I believe some smoothing in the negative gradients in the stock's price is mainly due to the recent (and hopefully many more upcoming) introduction of new Powermacs, plus some passage of healing time after Apple's dreadful earning announcement. Unfortunately, even without discounting for Apple's continuing loss in the market share to Windows 95, some developments concerning Apple's Copeland OS and Windows NT have lead me to think that Window NT (next version for all mass) may actually beat Apple's Copeland to the market and dominate. This may be is the reason for the most recent drop and possible further price drop. You may know that a significant consensus is there in acknowledging that Windows NT is an equivalent or better operating system of the future (in many aspects) than upcoming Copland. And yes, there is already a strong implementation/migration momentum in corporate and industry computing environment toward Windows NT. Based on the timeframe of both Microsoft and Apple's delays in the introduction of their respective OS (Windows NT from this summer to early next year and Copeland from late this year to sometime next year), Windows NT may come out early than Copeland. A recent Harsook Letter stressed the importance of the timeframe for Copeland's release by essentially stating that a dire consequence may await for Apple if Copeland is further delayed beyond 1st quarter of 1997.

Of course, I am not stating anything new here but my perception and being an avid Macintosh fan/user, I hope that someone can prove my view a hogwash...However, you know the marketeer's way of make something out of nothing..

A.J.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext