SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ Facts Thread: Ben Ezra, Weinstein and Company, Inc.
BNEZ 0.00Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ellen who wrote (31)12/16/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: Ellen   of 86
 
FAHN - part 1

MEMBER FIRM: FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC.

BD NUMBER: 249

NASD Member Firm: FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC.

BD Number: 249

12/15/98 SUMMARY INFORMATION

12/15/98: 7/30/98 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): SUITABILITY; BRCH OF

FIDUCIARY DT. THE AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED

BY CUSTOMER-$500,000.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION

CASE NO. 95-06034]

12/15/98: 6/26/98 NYSE CENSURE AND FINE

FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. WAS CENSURED AND FINED $100,000.00 BY THE NYSE AND AN

UNDERTAKING TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AND IMPLEMENT ITS

RECOMMENDATIONS. FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. ENTERED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE NEW YORK

STOCK EXCHANGE CONSENTING TO THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: 1.) SEC REGULATION

240.15c3-3(d), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY FAILING

TO REDUCE SECURITIES IN DEFICIT CONDITION TO ITS POSSESSION OR CONTROL AS

REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION; 2.) SEC REGULATION 240.15c3-3(c)(1), PROMULGATED

PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION

SHOWING THAT SECURITIES IN MUTUAL FUND CUSTODY ACCOUNTS WERE NOT SUBJECT TO

LIEN; 3.) SEC REGULATION 240.15c3-3(c)(4), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE

EXCHANGE AT, BY FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT

SECURITIES IN FOREIGN CUSTODY ACCOUNTS WERE NOT SUBJECT TO LIEN; 4.) SEC

REGULATION 240.15c3-3(b)(2), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY

FAILING TO ESTABLISH THAT ITS SEGREGATION SYSTEM WAS NOT CREATING OR

INCREASING DEFICITS; 5.) SEC REGULATION 240.8c-1, PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE

EXCHANGE ACT, BY IMPROPERLY CUMMINGLING CUSTOMERS' SECURITIES WITH FIRM

SECURITIES; 6.) FEDERAL RESERVE REGULATION T, 220.4 AND EXCHANGE RULE 431 BY

FAILING TO MARGIN SECURITIES IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS AS REQUIRED AND BY

IMPROPERLY EXTENDING CREDIT TO ITS CUSTOMERS; 7.) SECTION 17(a) OF THE

EXCHANGE ACT AND SEC REGULATIONS 240.17a-3 AND FAIING TO MAKE AND KEEP CURRENT

AND PRESERVE CERTAIN OF ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS; 8.) EXCHANGE RULE 410 IN THAT

CERTAIN ORDER TICKETS WERE NOT PROPERLY PREPARED; 9.) EXCHANGE RULE 440b.13,

1

IN THAT CERTAIN SELL ORDER TICKETS WERE NOT MARKED "LONG" OR "SHORT"; 10.)

EXCHANGE RULE 342.11 IN THAT TWO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OPERATED FROM

THEIR RESIDENCES WITHOUT PRIOR EXCHANGE APPROVAL; 11.) EXCHANGE RULE 342 IN

THAT IT FAILED: a) REASONABLY TO SUPERVISE OR CONTROL CERTAIN OF ITS BUSINESS

CONTROLS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES AND

REGULATIONS OF THE EXCHANGE AND THE SEC c) TO ESTABLISH ADEQUATE CONTROLS,

INCLUDING A SYSTEM TO FOLLOW-UP AND REVIEW, TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH RULES

AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CERTAIN CHINESE WALL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. ****

5/19/98 - UNLESS A REVIEW BY THE NYSE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS REQUESTED, THIS

DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL 25 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF THE HEARING

PANEL'S DETERMINATION HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE FIRM.**** **** 6/26/98 - THE

DECISION IS FINAL AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.**** [NYSE DOCKET/CASE NO.: HPD

98-48]lm/ba

12/15/98: 6/18/98 NASD CENSURE AND FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. WAS CENSURED AND FINED

$500 BY THE NASD FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OR MSRB RULE G-37 IN THAT FIRM FAILED

TO DISCLOSE ON FORMS G-37 NEGOTIATED UNDERWRITINGS IN WHICH IT PARTICIPATED AT

A SYNDICATE MEMBER; AND, FAILED TO TIMELY SUBMIT FORMS G-37. [NASD COMPLAINT

NO. C10970151] jm

12/15/98: 6/04/98 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): CHURNING; SUITABILITY;

ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE; BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT. THE AWARD

INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$515,000.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN

DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 97-04204]

12/15/98: 3/24/98 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; BRCH

OF FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE; CHURNING. THE AWARD

INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$254,190.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF

REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 96-05303]

2

12/15/98: 1/07/98 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING;

SUITABILITY; MISREPRESENTATION; MISREPRESENTATION. THE AWARD INCLUDED:

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$200,000.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL.

[NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 92-02683]

12/15/98: 11/26/97 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): SUITABILITY; BRCH OF

FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED-BREACH OF CONTRACT; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE

TO SUPERVISE. THE AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED

BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$199,666.00;

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$199,666.00. RELIEF

REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 95-04858]
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext