FAHN - part 1
  MEMBER FIRM: FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC.
  BD NUMBER: 249
  NASD Member Firm: FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC.
  BD Number: 249
  12/15/98 SUMMARY INFORMATION
  12/15/98: 7/30/98 NASD ARBITRATION
  SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER
  AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): SUITABILITY; BRCH OF
  FIDUCIARY DT. THE AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED
  BY CUSTOMER-$500,000.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS,
  AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY
  CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION
  CASE NO. 95-06034]
  12/15/98: 6/26/98 NYSE CENSURE AND FINE
  FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. WAS CENSURED AND FINED $100,000.00 BY THE NYSE AND AN
  UNDERTAKING TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AND IMPLEMENT ITS
  RECOMMENDATIONS. FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. ENTERED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE NEW YORK
  STOCK EXCHANGE CONSENTING TO THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: 1.) SEC REGULATION
  240.15c3-3(d), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY FAILING
  TO REDUCE SECURITIES IN DEFICIT CONDITION TO ITS POSSESSION OR CONTROL AS
  REQUIRED BY THE REGULATION; 2.) SEC REGULATION 240.15c3-3(c)(1), PROMULGATED
  PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
  SHOWING THAT SECURITIES IN MUTUAL FUND CUSTODY ACCOUNTS WERE NOT SUBJECT TO
  LIEN; 3.) SEC REGULATION 240.15c3-3(c)(4), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE
  EXCHANGE AT, BY FAILING TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT
  SECURITIES IN FOREIGN CUSTODY ACCOUNTS WERE NOT SUBJECT TO LIEN; 4.) SEC
  REGULATION 240.15c3-3(b)(2), PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT, BY
  FAILING TO ESTABLISH THAT ITS SEGREGATION SYSTEM WAS NOT CREATING OR
  INCREASING DEFICITS; 5.) SEC REGULATION 240.8c-1, PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO THE
  EXCHANGE ACT, BY IMPROPERLY CUMMINGLING CUSTOMERS' SECURITIES WITH FIRM
  SECURITIES; 6.) FEDERAL RESERVE REGULATION T, 220.4 AND EXCHANGE RULE 431 BY
  FAILING TO MARGIN SECURITIES IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS AS REQUIRED AND BY
  IMPROPERLY EXTENDING CREDIT TO ITS CUSTOMERS; 7.) SECTION 17(a) OF THE
  EXCHANGE ACT AND SEC REGULATIONS 240.17a-3 AND FAIING TO MAKE AND KEEP CURRENT
  AND PRESERVE CERTAIN OF ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS; 8.) EXCHANGE RULE 410 IN THAT
  CERTAIN ORDER TICKETS WERE NOT PROPERLY PREPARED; 9.) EXCHANGE RULE 440b.13,
  1
  IN THAT CERTAIN SELL ORDER TICKETS WERE NOT MARKED "LONG" OR "SHORT"; 10.)
  EXCHANGE RULE 342.11 IN THAT TWO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OPERATED FROM
  THEIR RESIDENCES WITHOUT PRIOR EXCHANGE APPROVAL; 11.) EXCHANGE RULE 342 IN
  THAT IT FAILED: a) REASONABLY TO SUPERVISE OR CONTROL CERTAIN OF ITS BUSINESS
  CONTROLS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES AND
  REGULATIONS OF THE EXCHANGE AND THE SEC c) TO ESTABLISH ADEQUATE CONTROLS,
  INCLUDING A SYSTEM TO FOLLOW-UP AND REVIEW, TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH RULES
  AND REGULATIONS REGARDING CERTAIN CHINESE WALL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. ****
  5/19/98 - UNLESS A REVIEW BY THE NYSE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS REQUESTED, THIS
  DECISION WILL BECOME FINAL 25 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF THE HEARING
  PANEL'S DETERMINATION HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE FIRM.**** **** 6/26/98 - THE
  DECISION IS FINAL AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.**** [NYSE DOCKET/CASE NO.: HPD
  98-48]lm/ba
  12/15/98: 6/18/98 NASD CENSURE AND FINE
  ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FAHNESTOCK & CO., INC. WAS CENSURED AND FINED
  $500 BY THE NASD FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OR MSRB RULE G-37 IN THAT FIRM FAILED
  TO DISCLOSE ON FORMS G-37 NEGOTIATED UNDERWRITINGS IN WHICH IT PARTICIPATED AT
  A SYNDICATE MEMBER; AND, FAILED TO TIMELY SUBMIT FORMS G-37. [NASD COMPLAINT
  NO. C10970151] jm
  12/15/98: 6/04/98 NASD ARBITRATION
  SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER
  AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): CHURNING; SUITABILITY;
  ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE; BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT. THE AWARD
  INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$515,000.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT
  ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN
  DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 97-04204]
  12/15/98: 3/24/98 NASD ARBITRATION
  SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER
  AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING; BRCH
  OF FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE TO SUPERVISE; CHURNING. THE AWARD
  INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$254,190.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT
  ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF
  REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 96-05303]
  2
  12/15/98: 1/07/98 NASD ARBITRATION
  SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER
  AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING;
  SUITABILITY; MISREPRESENTATION; MISREPRESENTATION. THE AWARD INCLUDED:
  ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$200,000.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES,
  AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL.
  [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 92-02683]
  12/15/98: 11/26/97 NASD ARBITRATION
  SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER
  AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): SUITABILITY; BRCH OF
  FIDUCIARY DT; ACCOUNT RELATED-BREACH OF CONTRACT; ACCOUNT RELATED - FAILURE
  TO SUPERVISE. THE AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED
  BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY
  CUSTOMER-$0.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT
  ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST,
  AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT
  ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY
  CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS,
  AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00;
  ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$199,666.00;
  ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$199,666.00. RELIEF
  REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 95-04858]  |