SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : IRS, Tax related strategies--Traders

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Colin Cody who wrote (644)12/16/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Spots  Read Replies (1) of 1383
 
Thanks for the responses, Colin.

I don't know of a
contradictory rule, except that a wash sale can't be
avoided by designating shares, which is itself an
inference from the statement that a wash can't be
avoided even by related-party transactions or
transactions in different accounts. I don't
know where specifically I read this, but I have
read it in a number of IRS instructions. I believe
even in the 1040 or 1040 D instructions (but maybe
the cap gains & losses pub).

HOWEVER, if the designated shares showing a gain
avoids the wash rule, none of the other considerations
matter.

Again, thanks to everyone who took the time to answer.

Spots
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext