SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ Facts Thread: Ben Ezra, Weinstein and Company, Inc.
BNEZ 0.00Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ellen who wrote (37)12/16/1998 6:04:00 PM
From: Ellen   of 86
 
HRZG - part 1

MEMBER FIRM: HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC.

BD NUMBER: 2186

NASD Member Firm: HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC.

BD Number: 2186

12/15/98 SUMMARY INFORMATION

12/15/98: 11/04/98 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): ACCOUNT RELATED-BREACH OF

CONTRACT; EXECUTIONS-FAILURE TO EXECUTE; BRCH OF FIDUCIARY DT; OTHER. THE

AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$24,000.00; PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT

ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00; OTHER MONETARY RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$0.00; REGULAR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-. RELIEF

REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 97-05316]

12/15/98: 7/20/98 NASD CENSURE AND FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS CENSURED AND

FINED $10,000 BY THE NASD, AND AGREED TO AN UNDERTAKING TO REVISE THE FIRM'S

WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES RELATING TO FIRM QUOTE COMPLIANCE IN A MANNER

NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE STAFF. THE REVISED PROCEDURES SHOULD BE SUBMITTED

WITHIN 60 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AWC BY THE NAC. THE NASD

ALLEGED THAT THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS OCCURRED: FIRM FAILED TO EXECUTE 85

PREFERENCED SELECTNET ORDERS WHICH WERE PRESENTED TO THE FIRM AT THE FIRM'S

PUBLISHED BID OR PUBLISHED OFFER IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN ITS

PUBLISHED QUOTATION SIZE, AND, THEREFORE, FAILED TO HONOR ITS PUBLISHED

QUOTATION. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUTES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC

RULE 11Ac1-1, NASD CONDUCT RULE 3320 AND NASD MARKETPLACE RULE 4613(b). [NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS980064 AWC]hk

12/15/98: 1/30/98 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$2,200.OO BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD

MARKETPLACE RULE 6130 FOR EXECUTING 11 SHORT SALE TRANSACTIONS WITHOUT

IDENTIFYING THE TRANSACTIONS AS SHORT SALE IN ITS REPORTING TO THE AUTOMATED

1

CONFIRMATION TRANSACTION SERVICE.***$2,200 PAID ON 4/10/98, INVOICE NO.

98-MS-306***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS970077 AWC] jm

12/15/98: 8/11/97 NASD CENSURE AND FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS CENSURED AND

FINED $11,000.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD

CONDUCT RULES 2110, IM-2110-2, 3010 AND MARKETPLACE RULE 6130(d) FOR THE

FOLLOWING ACTIVITY: THE FIRM FAILED TO CONTEMPORANEOUSLY EXECUTE THREE

CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDERS; IMPROPERLY REPORTED 48 TRANSACTIONS THROUGH THE

AUTOMATED CONFIRMATION TRANSACTION SERVICE (ACT); AND FAILED TO ESTABLISH,

MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS LIMIT

ORDER ACTIVITY.***$11,000.00 PAID ON 10/31/97, INVOICE NO. 97-MS- 794***[NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS960214(A) AWC]hk

12/15/98: 7/25/97 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING;

ACCOUNT RELATED-MARGIN CALLS; OTHER. THE AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY

DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$1,062.50; PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$1,250.00; OTHER COSTS, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$42.53; ATTORNEY'S FEES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$1,196.00. RELIEF

REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO. 97-03104]

12/15/98: 7/11/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$2,500.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED THAT HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC

VIOLATED CONDUCT RULE 2110 FOR CANCELLING SIX CUSTOMERS TRANSACTIONS WHICH HAD

BEEN EXECUTED THROUGH ITS AUTOMATED EXECUTION SERVICE ("AUTO-EX") BECAUSE OF

ITS MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT THE TRANSACTION HAS BEEN ERRONEOUSLY

EXECUTED***$2,500.00 PAID ON 8/22/97, INVOICE #97-MS-692***[NASD DOCKET/CASE

NO. CMS 970002(A) AWC]

12/15/98: 6/10/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$5,000.00 WITH A REQUIREMENT TO SCHEDULE A COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE WITH NASD

REGULATION. THE NASD ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED MARKETPLACE RULE 4613(d)

FOR ENTERING QUOTATIONS INTO THE NASDAQ SYSTEM THAT EXCEEDED THE PARAMETERS

2

FOR MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPREADS IN FIVE SECURITIES ON FIVE DAYS. ***$5,000.00

PAID ON 7/28/97, INVOICE #97-MS-540***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS 960050 AWC]

12/15/98: 4/23/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC WAS FINED

$15,000.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM ENTERED QUOTATIONS IN

NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET SYSTEM SECURITIES THAT EXCEEDED THE PARAMETERS FOR

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPREADS.***$15,000.00 PAID ON 6/11/97, INVOICE

#97-MS-421***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS960186 AWC]hk

12/15/98: 4/23/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$8,000.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED MARKETPLACE

RULE 4613(e) FOR ENTERING OR MAINTAINING QUOTATIONS IN THE NASDAQ STOCK

MARKET, DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS, WHICH CAUSED A LOCKED AND/OR CROSSED

MARKET CONDITION TO OCCUR IN FIVE SECURITIES.***$8,000 PAID ON 6/11/97,

INVOICE #97-MS-436***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS 960205AWC]

12/15/98: 2/21/97 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): UNAUTHORIZED TRADING;

MISREPRESENTATION; OMISSION OF FACTS; OTHER. THE AWARD INCLUDED:

ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$8,550.00;

PUNITIVE/EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$75,000.00; OTHER COSTS,

AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$5,650.00; INTEREST, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00.

RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD ARBITRATION CASE NO.

96-03496]

12/15/98: 1/27/97 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$1,000.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED CONDUCT RULE

2110 AND IM-2110-2 FOR FAILING TO PROTECT A 300 SHARE LIMIT ORDER AT THE TIME

IT WAS OBLIGATED TO DO SO.***$1,000.00 PAID ON 3/27/97, INVOICE

#97-MS-130***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS960121 AWC]hk

12/15/98: 7/15/96 NASD FINE

3

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED $6,000

BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED PART V, SECTION 2(d) OF SCHEDULE D TO THE

ASSOCIATION'S BY-LAWS IN THAT ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, FIRM ENTERED QUOTATIONS

INTO THE NASDAQ SYSTEM THAT EXCEEDED THE PARAMETERS FOR THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE

SPREADS.*** $6,000.00 FULLY PAID AS OF 9/10/96, INVOICE #96-MS-592***[NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS960037]hk

12/15/98: 6/04/96 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION AWARD. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC

CUSTOMER AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S):

EXECUTIONS-EXECUTION PRICE; EXECUTIONS-FAILURE TO EXECUTE. THE AWARD

INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$9,375.00,

AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$9,375.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; OTHER MONETARY

RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$150.00, AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$150.00

JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; OTHER MONETARY RELIEF, AMOUNT ASKED BY CUSTOMER-$0.00,

AMOUNT AWARDED TO CUSTOMER-$0.00 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. [NASD ARBITRATION

CASE NO. 96-02289]

12/15/98: 3/15/96 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FINED $6,500.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED

VIOLATIONS OF PART V, SECTION 2(D) OF SCHEDULE TO THE ASSOCIATION'S BY-LAWS IN

THAT THE FIRM ENTERED QUOTATIONS INTO THE NASDAQ SYSTEM THAT EXCEEDED THE

PARAMETERS FOR MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SPREADS.***$6,500.00 PAID ON 4/16/96, INVOICE

#96-MS-245***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS950123]hk

12/15/98: 9/25/95 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED

$1,000.00 BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF RULE 11AC1-1C OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, PART V, SECTION 2B OF SCHEDULE D OF THE

ASSOCIATION'S BY-LAWS AND ARTICLE III, SECTIONS 1 AND 6 OF THE ASSOCIATION'S

RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE BY FAILING TO HONOR THE QUOTATIONS IT CAUSED TO BE

DISSEMINATED THROUGH THE NASDAQ SYSTEM (BACKING AWAY).***$1,000.00 PAID ON

10/19/95 INVOICE #95-MS-661***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS950048]

12/15/98: 6/02/95 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FINED $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS OF PART 5,

SECTION 2(b) OF SCHEDULE D TO THE ASSOCIATION'S BY-LAWS, AND RULE 11Ac1-1(c)

4

OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 IN THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HONOR THE QUOTATIONS

IT CAUSED TO BE DISSEMINATED THROUGH THE NASDAQ SYSTEM.***$2,000.00 PAID ON

7/18/95, INVOICE #95-MS.409***[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS940115]hk

12/15/98: 4/19/94 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED $750.00

BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGE VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF THE RULES

OF FAIR PRACTICE IN THAT HERZOG UPDATED QUOTATIONS IN THE BULLETIN BOARD

SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR UPDATING FOREIGN OR ADR SECURITIES ON

THE BULLETIN BOARD.***$750 PAID ON 5/10/94, INVOICE #94-MS-313*** [NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS940003]hk

12/15/98: 3/09/94 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FINED $4,000 FOR VIOLATIONS OF PART V, SECTION

2(d) OF SCHEDULE C FOR ENTERING NASDAQ QUOTATIONS CONCERNING EXCESS SPREADS.

[NASD COMPLAINT NO. CMS930082-AWC]

12/15/98: 1/10/94 NASD ARBITRATION

SUBJECT OF AN NASD ARBITRATION. THE ARBITRATION INVOLVED A PUBLIC CUSTOMER

AND WAS FILED BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING DISPUTE(S): MISREPRESENTATION. THE

AWARD INCLUDED: ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$93,800.00; ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, AMOUNT ASKED BY

CUSTOMER-$60,000.00. RELIEF REQUESTS HAVE BEEN DENIED IN FULL. [NASD

ARBITRATION CASE NO. 91-01315]

12/15/98: 12/17/93 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; FINED $3,000 BY THE NASD FOR VIOLATIONS OF

PART VI, SECTION 2(d) OF SCHEDULE D FOR ENTERING NASDAQ QUOTATIONS CONTAINING

EXCESS SPREADS.***$3,000.00 PAID ON 1/27/94 INVOICE #94-MS-24*** [NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS930060]hk

12/15/98: 8/26/93 NASD FINE

ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT; HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC. WAS FINED $500.00

BY THE NASD. THE NASD ALLEGES VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE III, SECTION 1 OF THE

5

RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE IN THAT THE FIRM UPDATED QUOTATIONS IN THE BULLETIN

BOARD SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE TIME FOR UPDATING FOREIGN OR ADR SECURITIES

ON THE BULLETIN BOARD.***$500.00 PAID ON 9/14/93 INVOICE #93-MS- 677***[NASD

COMPLAINT NO. CMS930025 AWC]hk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext