" Months go by and Zulu's share price plummets downward. Throughout all of this time you're constantly damning Zulu."
As was the market. The market and I seem to be in agreement.
"Recently, a classic Taraesque move, you printed a table of Zulu's declining share prices, implying Zulu is all bad."
That's your interpetation. I made no implication, other than that the stock price was going down, and investors would have been better to have sold or not invested in the first place.
"You even chided those who didn't sell, when you told them to do so"
Do you disagree that those who did not take my advice would have been happier if they had?
" After our exchange, someone sends me, via PM, a copy of the Bruno post describing the Business Week article and alleged relationships of Stock Detective with Canadian brokerage firms shorting stocks which SD negatively fingers.
6) And now you're wondering what any of this has to do with you. I guess, so am I"
Then why did you mention my name in connection with that post? You admit (right above) that you don't know what it has to do with me. If it has nothing to do with me, then why did you mention my name?
"But the reality is this. If you're going to print a list of Zulu's misfortune, then you're going to hear from me some of the reasons for that misfortune."
ZULU's misfortunes are ZULU's fault.
" Note I didn't mention, above, the fact evidence exists to show you were trying to set the table for shorting ESVS close to the same time period of the negative press--on SI's Roger's Shot Picks Thread."
Would you disagree that that was a supurb short pick? While I didn't short it (I delayed too long, and then they did the split, making it non-shortable), anybody who did could have made a quite successful trade. |
