NeuroStock Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : NeuroStock

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Vic Nyman who wrote (491)	12/18/1998 8:41:00 AM
From: Jay Hartzok	Read Replies (1) of 805

Vic, A few thoughts: One would think that two identical nets would train exactly the same. Obviously that's not the case. It would seem that out of the infinite number of neural patterns available, Neuro randomly selects the neural patterns to begin the training. If this is the case, then two identical nets would almost never train alike. As the training progresses and Neuro tries out and discards unsatisfactory neural patterns, I would think that the two identical nets would eventually become the same providing, of course, that each net finally found the same best pattern to make predictions from. To over simplify, I suppose you could say that the two nets took different roads to end up at the same place. How much additional training it would take to get these two nets to become identical is anyone's guess. These are just some of my thoughts and may not have any validity at all. I will post Andrew's comments as soon as he replies. Jay

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next