Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (22141)	12/18/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) of 67261

>>If the Supreme Court ruled that a sitting President could be named in a civil suit for illegalities committed before his presidency, why then, is it necessary to have sealed criminal indictments which can only be unsealed after he is out of office? Criminal law. Starr believes, along with most others, that a sitting President cannot be indicted. They believe that the only Constitutional remedy against a criminal President is impeachment. Be advised that is also an argument that censure is unconstitutional, which it is for many other reasons, bill of attainder, separation of powers etc... Once he is no longer Prez, through impeachment or time, Starr can bring him to justice.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next