Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Machaon who wrote (22232)	12/18/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<<Let's talk in terms of reasonable doubt.>> There have been a lot of accusations about bc. Many have come from the does in his own back yard, not his political opponents. He is the one that keeps coming up as a liar. If I did not see him lying so convincingly to me, you and the rest of the country on national tv, I could probably still harbor some "reasonable doubt." Conspiracies aren't always just a term used as a political ploy, sometimes they really do happen. The key here is the word reasonable. Reasonable does not mean beyond all posibility, it means with human reason does this scenario seem likely or doubtful and where I have doubts which are reasonable and which are unrealistic. To me (a non partison player) it is reasonable to believe rather doubt that a guy who's a proven liar in some situations is a liar beyond reasonable doubt in the face of all the uncontested evidence in this situation. The question then for me is simply a matter of law, not reasonable doubt. Does the law support impeachement for perjury and obstruction of justice or not.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next