Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (22252)	12/18/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Dipy stated it exactly as I posed it in my question. It's clear you jumped in to call Bob stupid just out of some sense of pleasure in doing so, and without even being aware of what the issue was. Nuff said. <<As for the President fabricating lies and being left off the hook, the case has been settled, you know? Perjury in inadmissible evidence in a dismissed civil case, later settled out of court. Now how often does that get prosecuted?>> Dan, the Judge, then the Supreme Court, both ruled that the evidence was admissable. Now the federal appeals court has ruled that the evidence missing due to the perjuries may have had a material effect on the outcome- the dismissal. How often does that get prosecuted? ALWAYS! It's EXACTLY the sort of perjury that gets prosecuted. Without this evidence of perjury, and the subsequent belief of Clinton that the dismissal would have been overturned upon appeal, there would have been no settlement. Without this evidence of perjury, there may have been no appeal at all! As I say, Clintons perjury very nearly save him 850grand. .

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next