Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 128.56

+6.1%

Feb 6 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Enigma who wrote (24552)	12/18/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (1) of 116972

enigma: You won't see any serious defense mounted by Clinton that he did not commit perjury. If he had one he would not have utilized the tactic of attacking Starr and outing the Republican bad boys. Can anybody in Washington keep his zipper up??? I turned toward the view that Clinton was clearly guilty, when it became obvious that his tactic was to try everyone else but himself. You are falling for the oldest sucker tactic in the trial lawyer's manual. If you don't have a credible defense, try someone else. The crazy thing is the American people don't see it. As for the so called experts that say the perjury case is weak, they are just Clinton apologists. I don't know of any lawyer that I respect that thinks it is would be that difficult a case. There is just too much corroborating evidence that he lied intentionally, and as I stated above, I believe that if he had a real defense, we would have heard it by now. Live long and prosper, Little joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next