SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 170.90-1.3%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Perry LaForge who wrote (20071)12/19/1998 12:07:00 AM
From: Ramus  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Perry,

Thanks for posting on this thread. When I started reviewing the proposals submitted to the ITU I was struck by how incomplete the ETSI UTRA W-CDMA proposal was compared to the CDMA-2000 proposal. For instance, they mention looking at the use of Turbo codes but had not yet implemented them. Instead they employ a concatenated Reed-Solomon/convolutional coding scheme which is not exactly state of the art. You know that the ETSI and others would have us believe that W-CDMA is technically superior to anything else extant. But I find otherwise when I compare the details of the proposals. What do the operators...service providers think? What do their technical people say about the relative merits of the two proposals?

Regards

Walt
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News