SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
LRCX 148.32-3.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (7442)12/19/1998 3:57:00 AM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) of 10921
 
Katherine - If new orders are less than old orders, then future revenue expectations are less than current actual revenue. That sounds like shrinkage to me.

This is of course true if orders are static, or for lack of any information, you must assume that they are static. But if you know that orders are not static, and are actually sloping upward, then this is an untrue statement. That is the point we are trying to make - your assumption is true only if you throw out some of the information. Thus the real question is how reliable is that information that you are throwing away (the slope of orders). If it is unreliable as a predictor of future orders then you are correct. OTOH, if it is accurate, then you are wrong. We believe the latter, you believe the former.

Clark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext