Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: nihil who wrote (1101)	12/19/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Caroline	Read Replies (1) of 122087

Funny post, thanks. Key phrase there, I think we're hitting some nails on some heads: If as an individual he is fraudulently misrepresenting a stock to induce purchases, he might be sued successfully in tort. If, as it appears, he is charging for investment advice he could be violating SEC or State regulations. Being sued successfully in tort, i.e., he wronged an individual who may then sue him? But the real point: charging for investment advice. That's the only logical difference between a Tokyo Mex and, for example, someone like me. We both post picks, but I don't charge. Once someone charges for a service, he is subject to commerce restrictions. That being said, it would be interesting to know if he would be doing anything illegal if he did not charge. I believe we're getting somewhere with your answer, nihil. CB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next