>>See, I want to know what he did. Why can't he tell me what he did? What did he do, exactly? He's had a year to tell me and he ain't talkin'. I think he's dirty. So does my Congressman. Now it goes to the Senate. They get to find out WHAT EXACTLY HE FRIGGIN' DID.<<
Well, of COURSE you want to know what he did, TLC, and I congratulate you for your honesty. Most of the conservative sheep in this country are trying to convince people that this whole thing DIDN'T start because of an unnatural and obsessive interest in Clinton's sexual life. It's refreshing to see someone stand up and admit straight out -- "Yeah! I wanna know all the dirty details! Entertain me, entertain me!" It's also disgusting, sad and pathetic, but hey, no one's perfect (except me, of course).
(An aside for the intellectually challenged amongst us -- the above parenthetical is an attempt at levity. It is not intended to be taken seriously. You may, if you wish, address an entire post to nothing other than debating the issue of whether or not I am perfect, but it would be a waste of your valueless time.)
>> That's what the trial is for. <<
Really? This trial is about what exactly Clinton did? Funny -- today I heard numerous Republicans insisting that the trial had nothing to do with infidelity; that it was about perjury. Guess you just can't believe what you hear these days, can you.
Rose |
