Naxos Resources (NAXOF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sh who wrote (17306)	12/20/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) of 20681

Mr sh, You say you and others "believe in the richness of FL based on the numerous tests conducted by numerous entities". I have never said that I believe there are no precious metals at FL nor have I advocated disposing of the property. What I have said repeatedly is that I do not believe in J/L. Last time I checked J/L and FL were not the same thing. The only way you could interpret my comments as being dismissive of FL is if you believed J/L were the only option. You say you support a viable agreement with J/L. I have no problem with a viable agreement with J/L. However I would hazard a guess that your definition of viable is different than mine. I repeat what I said before, after the long history of false promises from them I would advocate an arms length relationship. They have gotten enough of our money without showing any verifiable results. They have proven much better at public relations than producing a process. I got a good laugh at your characterizing my views as wavering. I admire your ability to be so certain about the appropriate course of action when the company has never given us enough information to base a decision on. Please post for us the detailed information you have on exactly what Sid Kemp's plans were for giving up on FL. Please post the published details of J/L's long research and why you feel so strongly in Naxos giving them a viable deal. I seem to have missed the publication of these details that would allow one to come to a firm opinion. You may call this confused and wavering but I suspect most of the other's on this thread would view it as keeping an open mind until we have the information to make a decision. But you don't seem to be bothered by the lack of information. Your posts on this thread demonstrate that you made up your mind a long time ago. You appear to have bought into the pro J/L whispering campaign pretty completely. Your emotional response to my questioning J/L speaks to the intellectual bankruptcy of your position. Ordinarily I would object to someone calling me an idiot but your record of posting has so debased the value of your words that it is no big deal.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next