SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (23385)12/20/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: dave rose  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
<<<<I have been on the jury of both civil and criminal cases. In each case there was
conflicting testimony. Someone lied. There was never a followup prosecution for
perjury. The system of government still survives.>>>>

"Conflicting testimony" is not lying under oath. It is conflicting testimony. If it can be proved that someone has lied it is the duty of the court to prosecute. Whether they get a conviction is another matter.

<<<<Clinton's testimony was all over CNN for the world to see. He testified about how
under advise of counsel he used the narrowest definition of SEX to answer in such a
way that was truthfull but not necessarily helpfull. That is not perjury,>>>>>>

I do hope you are not going to tell me that the President did not lie. Even Barney Frank admitted the President lied. Lying under oath is the foundation of our judicial system, do you not agree?

daverose
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News