Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (23385)	12/20/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) of 67261

re: definitions, That was his claim that since it was not his intent to pleasure her, it was not classified as sex. I don't think anyone will buy that one. As for his other claim that none of the acts fell under the definition his lawyers crafted, that turned out to be contradicted by Monica. His claims about not being alone with her also didn't wash. He also substituted the word "relationship" when they asked about "relations" on other occasions, and claimed that he was not perjuring. There are other examples. But the guy is in serious need of psychiatric care.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next