Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (40208)	12/21/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 132070

"I wish I could get you to understand that Clinton has no actual quarrel with the quality of the evidence. The facts are not in dispute. It is the consequences of those facts that are in dispute." If you mean by "consequences" deciding whether or not he legally committed a crime, I agree with you. "The process was fair to Clinton. It is the result that you disagree with, and I do not dispute your right to do so." I respect your right to believe that the process was fair. The Republicans clearly believe that the process was fair -- but they're easy to persuade. The Democrats do not believe that the process was fair, as shown by their protest walk-out on Saturday after the Republicans prevented a vote on censure. Nor do I think that the majority of people in this country believe that the process was fair. Let me cite a couple of headlines from today's paper: "Impeachment Spectacle Magnifies Voter Estrangement" "GOP Assesses Possible Backlash Following Vote on Impeachment" BTW, these headlines come from that well-known leftist rag, The Wall Street Journal.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next