Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 234.37

+0.2%

Dec 2 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (30791)	12/21/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: Tradegod	Read Replies (2) of 164684

Per the Lawsuit I'm amazed at a couple of things: First, who's representing WalMart? Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden? How could WalMart's general counsel have been so inept to have not checked with good ol' Judge Huffman to see if he owned any stock prior to the court date. I mean who in Benton County, Arkansas doesn't own WalMart stock. I'd be even more surprised if ol Judge didn't have several nieces and nephews working for WalMart. All point back to WalMart's legal team negligence. Second, how did the judge allow this to happen, even without being questioned about it? Third, and most importantly, How can Bezos continue to be so lucky? Going up against WalMart in their own back yard had to look challenging. I mean he makes Clinton look like Roy Munson! From someone who unboxed last week at 285, reboxed half at 280, yes I'm frustrated.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next