SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jon Tara who wrote (17165)12/23/1998 1:50:00 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) of 18444
 
Mkingsle on Yahoo found this, Jon.

dlcppi.org

First, note that the inaugural date of this Task Force Committee is November 18, 1998.

Second, check out who is an esteemed member of this committee. Well, what do you know? It's the chairman of brandsforless. Frankly, Jon, I think you're going to have a very difficult time attempting to discredit brandforless, though I note from your previous posts you have already attempted to do so.

You should ask yourself, Jon: Why, in full awareness of Zulu's misfortunes and the ESVS delisting, is BFL still coming on board? The answer is an answer which you, to date, have always refused to accept: That ZULU and ESVS are legitimate and have legitimate purpose and intentions.

You might take your answer to the above question and then ask this one: Why would Robert Chmeil, a former Disney executive, come on board with ZULU/ESVS after James Green, also a former Disney executive, came on board and left? Do you think Chmeil and Green had a consultation before Chmeil agreed to come on board?

In my view, the sooner you realize what appears obvious, the sooner peace can be established on the SI and ESVS/Yahoo threads and, importantly, the sooner innocent investors will stop being scared, by postings such as yours, from making or continuing their ZULU/ESVS investment.

Ironically, you've always postulated the harm ZULU/ESVS does; but it's quite possible that it is you who is promulgating harm. Have you considered this?

I guess the answer as to who is funding this venture will eventually show up in SEC filings. Don't you agree? Meanwhile, why must you continue to invoke negative suppositions when the clear answers are not yet known?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext