SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Impeach versus Censure

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: uu who wrote (23)12/23/1998 3:25:00 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 31
 
You evade the question.

You criticize the Republican party for fulfilling their Constitutional duty. Your post mentions nothing of disgust for the Democrats who have turned a Constitutional crisis into another excuse to play partisan politics.

I have never been prouder of the members of Congress (both Republican and Democrat) that had the guts to vote as required by our Constitution. It is with great shame as an American that I look forward to a trial in the Senate unlikely to rise above politics.

You state "Every Empire in the history of mankind was destroyed by ... acts of arrogance, and misuse of powers." I couldn't have described William Jefferson Clinton better than you have.

I said before and it remains true "Perjury if gone unpunished would eliminate the need for a judicial system. No witness need fear legal reprisal for perjury, thus they can testify to advance whatever end they desire."

Returning to my original point, please define the gray area that makes it acceptable for Liberals to act illegally without losing moral high ground or being subject to punishment.

Peter Dierks
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext