SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (40738)12/23/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: Doug Millan  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Michael,

I'm confused and need help, and my apologies in advance if this seems trivial.

I'll illustrate with one specific trade then hopefully you can help with the strategy...

When IBM was around 150 in October, I bought a third of JAN 12O puts. Cost me a buck or so. W/ IBM now at 180, that dollar (same three months) buys me the same 120 strike. I would have expected in October, other things being equal, that if the stock were to go to 180 by January, my buck would buy me a 150 strike (or reasonably thereabouts) three months out. I guess this is volatility being built into the options prices. Big time.

When volatility goes up, I'd like to capitalize on it (from 180 on down, not just re-initiating the same 120 position). At the same time, the game now becomes more expensive to play on a per-share basis, making it harder to swing for fences as you say. Though a good sign fundamentally to see so much premium in put options as we go higher, such an exaggerated change to me suggests I need a new pair of dimes for determining the size of my suspenders in this market.

Thanks,
Doug
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext