SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom C who wrote (1074)12/23/1998 11:12:00 PM
From: David Eddy  Read Replies (1) of 1361
 
Tom C -

Montgomery County, MD

A pretty strange article. Hard to tell whether Y2K was or was not an issue. Have to get well into the piece to see that they've spent $17 million already. Doesn't give a comparison so we can't tell if that's a lot or a little money.

Tone of the article seems to be "gee, we ran the test & nothing happened...see, we told you so." So I'm confused. Was that $17 million just money down the toilet, or what?

Not exactly Pulitzer Prize material.

If I weren't familiar with Montgomery County's Y2K efforts, I'd be really confused by that Post article.

- David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext