BlackStar; I believe this sentence You posted, Not as much as your misguided childish crusading, I'm sure..., Could be considered by SI as a personal attack. I suggest You read paragraph B of the terms of use.
Regards,
Frank
Well, Frank. I didn't write those words because I wanted to aimlessly lash out at you. I actually believe that to be the case. I believe that the expressed opinion of people negative to the stock (FYI, I label you as negative towards Eutro) does more 'harm', ie puts more selling pressure on the stock than the singular event of Eutro closing for the holidays (see post #9688). As I said, they would not be able to profit from those few days anyway. In all likelihood they actually save some money from not 'keeping the lights on' unnecessarily.
It actually was a comment closely related to current events in the stock we are all discussing here. It was also a sincere reply to your, in my view, disrespectful and somewhat tactless exploitation of Eutros silence and the fact that it is currently 'popular' to make inferences about Eutro selling stock to buy gadgets.
It actually is a little ridiculous of you to imply (or should that be 'threat'?) that you would direct SI:s attention towards my posts so you can go on with your witless game of 'keep the ball rolling'? You are better served giving a truthful answer to James Benders questions. He has provided you with answers on nearly all questions but you have remained silent. I trust no one here, but if I had to choose, James Bender is the one who'd get my most neutral ear at this point.
In the grander scheme it all matters the same since it is the value that Eutro generates (or not) that will be my reward (or loss). You don't matter as nor do I.
To give you something to really consider and reply to in a constructive manner, I would like to share a thought of mine. You and some people 'of your persuasion towards Eutro' showed up here 'just before' the settling of the first case relating to the 50 million issue. There has been a barrage of negativity (one or two points have been good, that I grant you), and that barrage keeps on going now that the market is in panic. I just can't help asking myself if there is no connection here... "Are they bashing the stock so 'the four' and others can pick up their owed shares cheaper? Do they look to take positions when the stock stabilizes to get in on the ground floor? Are they connected to any business entitity with a bias towards Eutro? Are they honest people?". All these questions have more basis in real world events and actions than most things you say, imply or infer.
As I said before - it doesn't matter. Actually it plays into my hands as I can profit (hopefully) from the current situation. Buying stock, during tax selling season with a full selling panic on, in a company that has no or few assets while being in acquisition mode... Well, I think there are few better fixed ('fixed' as in static, to depend on) events to take advantage of. Only snag is I have to be prepared to hold for a year or three. I am, so I am looking for buy in points.
Oh, yes, I have sold Eutro stock for profit. I hope to do that again. I have also sold Eutro stock for a loss. I hope not to do that again.
Every time you post I expect you to give a good, well formulated, well thought out response. And every time you let me and possibly others down with your banter, your trifles and your mee-toos. You see, Frank, I don't attack you, it is the stuff you write that I sometimes find deserving comment. I don't know you and I have no interest in attacking your person.
I suggest you take a few deep breaths and think before you post. It will reflect better on you and it will be to all of our mutual benefit.
As a side note: you don't need to worry about sending this to SI Bob yourself as I will do that right away. I trust him to make an informed decision.
Sincerely,
Svante Gellerstam
mailto:svante.gellerstam@mbox328.swipnet.se
home1.swipnet.se (severly out of date) |
