SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (1584)12/26/1998 8:28:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee  Read Replies (1) of 122087
 
Anthony, thanks for all the short picks. Here is a little piece of humor for you. One of my mm friends laughed for at least a minute, hope you'll enjoy it.

<<MMs were accumulating because they were hitting the inside bid on every single
pullback.>>
exchange2000.com
Goldfinger, I hate to come across as condescending, but when I read something this stupid
and absurd, I can't help it. "Hitting" the inside bid means selling shares to buyers who are in
the inside market bidding for the stock, resulting in the lowering of the stock price. If you
are unable to get the most basic terminology correct, you have absolutely no business writing
this kind of posts to mislead others. As I matter of fact, I just faxed a copy of your post to a
market maker friend, and he is laughing controllably on the phone while I type right now. In
fact, I am going to post this in Anthony's thread so he can get a big chuckle out of it too. If
mms were really "hitting" the inside bid during every pullback, the stock would have far more
precipitously than it did.

And trust me, if Herzog, Wedbush and the rest want to accumulate shares, the last person
they would wish to show to is you. Rest be assured that they can accumulate easily, and
most of the time anonymously, by bidding thru INCA, ISLD, BTRD, Brass and the other
ECNs. Just explain to me why would they wish to tip their hands to a two bit amateur like
you, and more importantly, to the other mms?

<<MMs were hitting the inside bid at the valley of each pullback. It seemed obvious to me
they were accumulating.>>
exchange2000.com
Lying and making a fool of yourself once apparently was not enough, you had to do it again.
What a pity!

<<Can you read Level II activity? MMs did not sell a single share under 15 into the close.>>
exchange2000.com
You honestly believe anyone will fall for this?? Trust me, JOSE, MASH, TSCO and others
sold plenty of shares into the close. Besides, you were the one who stated that the mms were
"hitting" the inside bid -- now how can mms (or anyone else) hit the bids without selling
shares is a profound mystery.

<<2. If you paid any attention whatsoever to Level II the last 30 minutes of trading
yesterday, you might have noticed that MMs were not selling any shares under 15, and were
hitting the inside bid, accumulating around 13. If they were planning a dump Monday they
would have established large short positions.>>
exchange2000.com
Wow, lying and making a fool of yourself three times is not enough. You just had to do it
again. I leave it too you to figure out the fallacies of this paragraph.

I never thought I would nominate someone for the Thread Moron thread, but this time I am
absolutely compelled to. Mr. Goldfinger, for once, there is a title for which you are eminently
qualified.

Last, don't even try to accuse me of shorting this stock. I did very well on the long side and
still hold some shares which I most likely will sell into any speculative buying prior to the
CEO's appearance on CNBC.

Next

Previous





Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext