Brady, although I don't like the idea of deleting questions (especially given who has appointed himself the chief censor), Aleta has agreed to it, and so I will reluctently agree that your new set of questions is a good one. I like the new questions you have added, and the old ones have been tactfully re-written.
But I DO think we'd all like to know about those court judgements. And I do think it's awfully unfair that Pat has not been given an opportunity to explain them. You see, I am in agreement with PT! :)
Anyway, I hearby withdraw my list, to be replaced with your list.
PT is not going ot go along with your "no names" term, so I guess the modis opperandi remains the same - CWIII will FAX these tomorrow. If, for some reason, he doesn't, I will do so tomorrow evening.
Or, you could just submit em' yourself.
I do agree that he's either going to answer em or not, and isn't going to withhold answering based on "not liking" someone. So, I don't think we need some special "conduit". Save that for seances. :)
|
