SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FMK who wrote (6333)12/27/1998 10:20:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (2) of 27311
 
My apologies to the thread. I was out most of the day so I wasn't able to correct several erroneous statments made by FMK.

First regarding $2.50 per watt hour. Lev said if we can get $2.50 per watt hour, we can break even on a cash basis, but not cover depreciation at 1,800 batteries per day.

Two erroneous comments by Fred. (1) Fred claims $2.50 per watt hour as a given as the price they can sell the battery for, when all Lev said was if. (2) As I.N. Vestor has already pointed out, Lev said at $2.50 per hour and 1,800 batteries per day, this would be sufficient to break even on a cash basis, but not cover depreciation as claimed by Fred.

Third, Fred says the production yield will be 80% when Lev said during a conference call they are budgeting for a 50% yield.

Fourth, Fred claims line 1 can produce 2,500 batteries per shift (which would equate to about 5 batteries per minute when Lev said during the August CC the capacity of line 1 is 5 cells per minute.

I guess in the interest of having accurate information on this thread, I'm going to have to stay closer to my computer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext