SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Remington-Hall (REMH)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Arcane Lore who wrote (37)12/28/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Arcane Lore   of 48
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16010 / December 23, 1998

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. REMINGTON-HALL CAPITAL CORP., and DOUGLAS T. FONTENO, 3:98CV2470-G, USDC, ND/TX (Dallas Division)

On December 21, 1998, Judge Joe A. Fish, federal district judge for the Northern District of Texas, entered a final judgment by default against Douglas T. Fonteno ("Fonteno"), formerly president and chief executive officer of Remington-Hall Capital Corp. ("Remington-Hall"). The Securities and Exchange Commission's ("Commission") complaint charged Fonteno with raising at least $1 million from investors in a fraudulent offering of unregistered Remington-Hall stock. Further, the Commission's complaint charged that Fonteno distributed false and misleading informational releases to the public, including "spamming" (sending unsolicited e-mail) and website postings via the Internet, for the purpose of artificially increasing or supporting the price of the company's publicly traded shares.

Fonteno, who was convicted in 1996 for state securities fraud, recently pled guilty to violating the terms of his probation in the criminal matter, based on the violations set out in the Commission's complaint, and was sentenced to ten years incarceration.

The final judgment permanently enjoins Fonteno from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court also ordered Fonteno to pay disgorgement in the amount of $126,329.98, which represents the amount paid or attributable to him from the proceeds of unlawful securities transactions set out in the Commission's complaint, plus prejudgment interest of $6,252.18, and a civil penalty of $12,567. ... (Snip of repetitious text)

[ Securities and Exchange Commission v. Remington-Hall Capital Corp., and Douglas T. Fonteno, 3:98CV2470-G, USDC, ND/TX (Dallas Division)] (LR- )

Phillip W. Offill
Trial Counsel
Fort Worth District Office
817/978-6450

sec.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext