Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PartyTime who wrote (17337)	12/28/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) of 18444

PT, unfortunately, I didn't bookmark the page. I got the super economy-sized "all records for one price" for $15, and you can download as many as you want for 24 hours, but without the bookmark, I'd have to pay again. There were a good number of judgements that named only Pat Hayton. They were, generally, smaller judgements, typically a few thousand dollars. There were quite a number of judgements in the maximum of $5000 for small-claims court. But I think that Pat's business dealings are more germaine than his personal ones. I think it's less important if he didn't pay the florist (I don't know if he didn't pay a florist or not - that was just one of your examples) than if he was found liable in some business dealing. OF COURSE Pat Hayton isn't going to be the only defendant named in lawsuits over business dealings - there almost always is going to be some corporation involved. Congrats, PT, you've created yet another paper tiger and soundly conquered it!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next